Discover the benefits of Save PDFs of your favorite articles, authors and companies. Please turn off compatibility mode, upgrade your browser to at least Internet Explorer 9, or try using another browser such as Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. In my opinion the major change lies in widening the range of situations to which you can apply hedge accounting.
Subsequent treatment depends on whether the hedged item is transaction related or time value related. The aforementioned does require that the critical terms of the hedging instrument, in this case the option, and the hedged item are aligned similar. This treatment is also applicable to combinations of options, e.
In example 3, we consider entity X to be hedging a forecast receivable via an FX call. Note that under IAS39 the hedged item cannot contain an optionality if this optionality is not present in the underlying exposure. Hence, in this example, the hedged item cannot contain any time value. The time value of 30, can be used under IFRS9, but only by means of a separate test see row 5.
However, the time-intrinsic separation under IFRS9 in line 4 is similar to line 2 under IAS39, in which we choose to immediately remove the time value for the option from the hedging relationship.
In the last line, we separate between time and intrinsic values, but the time value of the option is aimed to be booked into OCI.
In this case, a test on both the intrinsic and the time element is performed. Cross-currency basis spread are considered a cost of hedging. The cross-currency basis spread can be defined as the liquidity premium of one currency over the other.
This premium applies to exchanges of currencies in the future, e. If a cross currency interest rate swap is used in combination with a single currency hedged item, for which this spread is not relevant, hedge ineffectiveness could arise. In order to cope with this mismatch, it has been decided to expand the requirements regarding the costs of hedging.
Hedging costs can be seen as cost incurred to protect against unfavourable changes. Similar to the accounting for the forward element of the forward rate, an entity can exclude the cross-currency basis spread and account for it separately when designating a hedging instrument.
In case a hypothetical derivative is used, the same principle applies. IFRS 9 states that the hypothetical derivative cannot include features that do not exist in the hedged item. Consequently, cross-currency basis spread cannot be part of the hypothetical derivative in the previously mentioned case. This means that hedge ineffectiveness will exist. Under IFRS9, there is the option to exclude the cross-currency basis and account for it separately.
In line 2, we can see the conditions under IFRS9 when a cross-currency basis is included: In line 3, we exclude the cross-currency basis from the test for the hedging instrument. In line 4, the cross-currency basis is included in a separate hedge relationship — we therefore perform an extra test on the cross-currency basis aligned versus actual values. The website was unable to process your contact request.
Please try again, or contact us via the contact page. FX exposure management — a new automated approach to solve an old problem.
Interested in the possible impact of IFRS 9 hedge accounting on your organization? Error The website was unable to process your contact request. Where the foreign entity reports in the currency of a hyperinflationary economy, the financial statements of the foreign entity should be restated as required by IAS 29 Financial Reporting in Hyperinflationary Economies , before translation into the reporting currency.
The requirements of IAS 21 regarding transactions and translation of financial statements should be strictly applied in the changeover of the national currencies of participating Member States of the European Union to the Euro — monetary assets and liabilities should continue to be translated the closing rate, cumulative exchange differences should remain in equity and exchange differences resulting from the translation of liabilities denominated in participating currencies should not be included in the carrying amount of related assets.
When a foreign operation is disposed of, the cumulative amount of the exchange differences recognised in other comprehensive income and accumulated in the separate component of equity relating to that foreign operation shall be recognised in profit or loss when the gain or loss on disposal is recognised.
When an entity presents its financial statements in a currency that is different from its functional currency, it may describe those financial statements as complying with IFRS only if they comply with all the requirements of each applicable Standard including IAS 21 and each applicable Interpretation.
Sometimes, an entity displays its financial statements or other financial information in a currency that is different from either its functional currency or its presentation currency simply by translating all amounts at end-of-period exchange rates.
This is sometimes called a convenience translation. A result of making a convenience translation is that the resulting financial information does not comply with all IFRS, particularly IAS In this case, the following disclosures are required: See Legal for additional copyright and other legal information. DTTL and each of its member firms are legally separate and independent entities. These words serve as exceptions.
Once entered, they are only hyphenated at the specified hyphenation points. Each word should be on a separate line. The full functionality of our site is not supported on your browser version, or you may have 'compatibility mode' selected.
Please turn off compatibility mode, upgrade your browser to at least Internet Explorer 9, or try using another browser such as Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Login or Register Deloitte User? Welcome My account Logout. Navigation International Accounting Standards.